I agree with the NV track being a freeway.. There was little to no room to pass. And even the fast 50 kids that got out of the groove would just about crash do to the dirt being clumps. They need to disc it after they rip it. I just think the whole thing needs to be more technical.
Jo haven't meet you yet but am wondering if you are against expanding OMA or what your thought is on this. Be for the good or the bad for OMA??
Jason and I are by no means against expanding the OMA. We had a couple interested, but it never really went anywhere, casual conversations, like I said. My concern with any new track is whether or not they can grow into a premium track. I think we currently have facilities that can meet that goal. We have 5 really nice places to race and ride, all have their strengths and weakness. All can improve, we know this. My question would be why focus on a new facility that is possibly further from that goal than our current tracks? I don't see any other track out there right now that is a hands down, no brainer addition to the OMA. I would really like to add a Dayton area, SW track. I don't see it right now.
BC isn't moving, I'm not opening another track.......EVER. One and done for me. When I'm old and gray I might buy one that's setup and ready and meets my specs, but I will never build one from scratch or renovate one, never again.