That's a little more extreme than what I had in mind. No real reason or advantage to renaming the age classes. Just the A,B,C classes possibly. Not really sure about any of it.
Oh yeah...this is thoughts that may help. You guys are leading the way.
No matter how it appears, it seems the goals of a set and order of classes is to make racing competitive, provide opportunity for riders to race atleast 2 classes (maybe limit riders to 2 classes max.), reduce the amount of classes to lower overall raceday time (maybe even increase laps), reduce conflict between racing in other organizations concerned about being able to race locally and nationally, get rid of sand-bagging in class structure also with other rules of limitations towards longevity in the "Rider Classes" and consistency on race day.
With previous class choices, it's like you have a bunch of tiny brushes to paint a big canvas or you could buy broader stroke brushes. Meaning - classes that offer a broader limit of age, skill, and machine to reduce amount of classes or brushes.
Riders will have to learn to race with more riders. Their is no reason 30-40 bikes shouldn't be on the track if at all possible.
I think this format has potential to be that flexible and effective with some tweaking and fresh thinking. It is change from the current set-up for sure.
Maybe we just have to understand the process will be refined as ever in OHMX starting with OMA; the reality is your prolly going to be dealing with 200-400 riders at each race on average. The class structure is the largest factor in how long a race day is. We the riders need to be satisfied in time and just enjoy it all.